Women's Journal

Agenda 40: Protecting American Farmers and Agriculture – Trump’s Vision for 2024

Agenda 40 Protecting American Farmers and Agriculture
Photo: Unsplash.com

By: Meridian Beverly Hills Investment and Legal Group

Donald Trump’s 2024 agenda includes a strong focus on supporting American farmers and protecting the U.S. agriculture industry. Throughout his political career, Trump has emphasized the importance of agriculture as the backbone of America’s economy, culture, and national security. His policies aim to strengthen the U.S. farming industry, enhance global competitiveness, and reduce reliance on foreign agricultural imports. Trump’s America First approach to agriculture prioritizes ensuring that American farmers have the resources, support, and trade agreements they need to thrive in an increasingly competitive global market.

This article will explore Trump’s vision for protecting American farmers, focusing on his trade policies, deregulation efforts, and initiatives aimed at boosting rural economies. We will also examine the support these policies have garnered among agricultural groups and the challenges they may face.

Promoting Fair Trade Agreements for American Farmers

A key component of Trump’s agricultural agenda is his commitment to ensuring that American farmers benefit from fair trade agreements that protect their interests and promote U.S. agricultural exports. Throughout his presidency, Trump pursued an aggressive trade agenda aimed at renegotiating international agreements that he argued were unfair to U.S. farmers and manufacturers. One of his notable achievements was the renegotiation of the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), which he replaced with the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA) in 2020.

The United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA)

The USMCA is a cornerstone of Trump’s trade policy for farmers. Under this agreement, U.S. farmers gained greater access to Canadian dairy markets, expanded export opportunities for poultry, eggs, and wheat, and enhanced protections for agricultural products. Trump has pointed to the USMCA as a major win for U.S. farmers, particularly in dairy-producing states like Wisconsin, where farmers had long struggled to compete with Canada’s dairy supply management system.

Supporters of the USMCA argue that it has helped to level the playing field for American farmers, ensuring that they can compete fairly in key export markets. The agreement has been praised by agricultural groups and farm advocacy organizations for providing new opportunities for growth and expanding market access for U.S. agricultural products.

However, critics argue that while the USMCA provided some benefits to U.S. farmers, it did not go far enough in addressing broader concerns about global trade imbalances and the long-term challenges facing the U.S. agricultural sector. Some have also expressed concerns about the continued use of tariffs on agricultural products, which they argue have disrupted supply chains and hurt farmers by increasing costs and reducing access to certain foreign markets.

Addressing Trade Relations with China

One of the biggest challenges facing American farmers during Trump’s first term was the trade war with China, which saw the imposition of tariffs on a wide range of agricultural products, including soybeans, corn, and pork. China had been a major market for U.S. agricultural exports, and the tariffs imposed in retaliation to Trump’s trade policies had a significant impact on farmers in states like Iowa and Illinois.

In response to the damage caused by the trade war, Trump’s administration negotiated the Phase One trade deal with China in 2020, which committed China to purchasing significant quantities of U.S. agricultural products, including soybeans and pork. The deal was hailed as a victory by Trump’s administration, with promises of increased sales to China and relief for struggling farmers.

Trump’s 2024 platform calls for continuing to hold China accountable to the Phase One commitments while pursuing additional trade agreements that benefit American farmers. Trump has argued that by maintaining a tough stance on China, the U.S. can protect its agricultural industry from unfair trade practices and ensure that American farmers are not undercut by foreign competitors.

Supporters of Trump’s approach to China argue that a strong stance is necessary to address intellectual property theft, currency manipulation, and subsidies that give Chinese farmers an unfair advantage in global markets. They believe that by standing up to China, Trump is protecting the long-term viability of U.S. agriculture and ensuring that American farmers can compete on a level playing field.

Reducing Regulatory Burdens on Farmers

Another central element of Trump’s agricultural agenda is his commitment to reducing regulatory burdens that he believes hinder the ability of farmers to thrive. During his first term, Trump’s administration rolled back a number of environmental regulations and policies that he argued were overly restrictive and costly for farmers.

Rolling Back the Waters of the United States (WOTUS) Rule

One of the notable regulatory rollbacks was Trump’s revision of the Waters of the United States (WOTUS) rule, which had been implemented under the Obama administration. The original WOTUS rule expanded the definition of federally regulated waters to include small streams, wetlands, and other bodies of water, which critics argued subjected farmers to excessive federal oversight and burdensome permitting requirements.

In 2020, Trump replaced the WOTUS rule with the Navigable Waters Protection Rule, which limited the scope of federal water regulations and returned more control to state and local governments. Supporters of the rollback, including many in the agricultural community, praised Trump for reducing what they saw as overreach by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), arguing that the WOTUS rule had made it more difficult and expensive for farmers to manage their land.

Critics of the rollback, however, argue that weakening environmental regulations could lead to negative consequences for water quality and ecosystems. They believe that the original WOTUS rule was necessary to protect wetlands and waterways from pollution and degradation, particularly in regions where agriculture is a major industry.

Supporting Deregulation in Pesticide Use and GMO Crops

Trump’s platform also includes support for deregulation in the areas of pesticide use and genetically modified organisms (GMO) crops. His administration worked to streamline the approval process for new agricultural technologies, including genetically engineered crops and new pesticide formulations, which he argued were essential for increasing agricultural productivity and ensuring that American farmers could stay competitive in the global market.

Trump’s platform calls for continuing these deregulatory efforts in 2024, ensuring that farmers have access to the tools and technologies they need to maximize yields and reduce costs. 

Supporters of deregulation argue that these measures are necessary to promote innovation in the agricultural sector and to protect farmers from burdensome and unnecessary regulations.

Critics, however, argue that reducing oversight of pesticide use and GMO crops could have negative consequences for the environment and public health. They believe that regulatory safeguards are necessary to ensure that agricultural practices do not harm biodiversity, soil health, or human well-being.

Supporting Rural Economies and Expanding Infrastructure

Trump’s 2024 platform also emphasizes the need to support rural economies and invest in the infrastructure necessary to ensure the long-term success of American agriculture. During his first term, Trump’s administration made significant investments in rural broadband expansion, recognizing that high-speed internet access is critical for modern farming operations and rural economic development.

Expanding Rural Broadband Access

One of Trump’s key initiatives was the expansion of rural broadband through the ReConnect program, which provided funding for internet service providers to build broadband infrastructure in underserved rural areas. Trump has argued that by expanding access to high-speed internet, farmers will be better able to utilize modern technologies like precision agriculture, which relies on data analytics and GPS technology to optimize farming practices and improve yields.

For 2024, Trump’s platform calls for continued investments in rural broadband infrastructure, as well as additional funding for rural development programs that support agricultural communities. Supporters of these initiatives argue that improving infrastructure in rural areas is essential for ensuring that farmers can remain competitive in a rapidly changing global market.

Enhancing Disaster Relief for Farmers

Another priority for Trump’s 2024 platform is expanding disaster relief programs for farmers affected by natural disasters, such as wildfires, floods, and droughts. During his first term, Trump’s administration worked to provide relief to farmers impacted by severe weather events, including significant aid packages for farmers affected by the Midwest flooding in 2019.

In his 2024 platform, Trump calls for continued support for crop insurance programs and the creation of new disaster relief initiatives aimed at helping farmers recover quickly from natural disasters. Supporters of these policies argue that providing timely and effective relief is critical for maintaining the financial stability of American farmers and ensuring that they can continue to produce food for the country.

Challenges and Criticism

While Trump’s agricultural policies have garnered strong support from conservative voters and farmers, they also face challenges from critics who argue that his trade policies, particularly the tariffs on China, have caused significant harm to the agricultural sector. Many farmers experienced financial strain due to retaliatory tariffs and disruptions in global supply chains, despite the aid provided by Trump’s administration through farm relief packages.

Critics also argue that Trump’s environmental rollbacks and deregulation efforts could have long-term consequences for the environment and public health, particularly in relation to water quality and the use of pesticides and GMOs.

Conclusion

Donald Trump’s 2024 agricultural platform reflects his commitment to supporting American farmers, protecting rural economies, and ensuring that the U.S. agriculture industry remains competitive on the global stage. By pursuing fair trade agreements, reducing regulatory burdens, and investing in rural infrastructure, TrumpDonald Trump’s 2024 agricultural platform reflects his commitment to supporting American farmers, protecting rural economies, and ensuring that the U.S. agriculture industry remains competitive on the global stage. By pursuing fair trade agreements, reducing regulatory burdens, and investing in rural infrastructure, Trump believes that American farmers can thrive and remain a crucial pillar of the U.S. economy. However, his policies face criticism regarding their long-term environmental impact and the consequences of trade disruptions. As Trump continues to advocate for American farmers, his agenda will likely remain a significant part of his political narrative, appealing to rural voters and the agricultural community.

 Meridian Beverly Hills Investment and Legal Group

Agenda 

(focused on agenda 40)

Dr. Sarah Sun Liew for U.S Senate show and today’s America and world new show
Connect with Dr. Sarah Sun Liew
Direct: (424) 343 7025

Tel: (424) 777 6461

Websites: www.sarahsenator.org info@drsarahliewforcongress.com

Facebook: www.facebook.com/sarahsun.liew

Twitter: www.twitter.com/Sarahliew7

YouTube: www.youtube.com/@dr.sarahsunliewforcongress884

Instagram: www.instagram.com/drliewsenate/

LinkedIn: www.linkedin.com/in/dr-sarah-sun-liew-dba-ph-d-postdoctoral-phds-dr-sarah-sun-liew-for-u-s-senate-77642138/

 

Published by: Martin De Juan

Share this article

This article features branded content from a third party. Opinions in this article do not reflect the opinions and beliefs of Women's Journal.