Skip to main content

Women's Journal

Dr. Michele Sherwood Discusses Protein Intake for Strength and Healthy Aging

By Jay KT

Protein is a hot topic today, and for good reason. We hear constantly that we need more protein to build muscle, preserve lean mass and support healthy aging. But how much do we actually need? Where should we begin? And at what point does the pursuit of more protein stop providing meaningful benefit?

Those questions matter because protein should never be considered in isolation. Exercise and nutrition work together to preserve muscle and physical function. Muscle is metabolically active tissue that helps us move, manage fuel and maintain our ability to perform the activities of daily living. Preserving it, and, when appropriate, building more of it, is one of the smartest investments we can make in long-term health.

Resistance training gives muscle a reason to adapt. Dietary protein supplies the amino acids needed for repair and growth. But there is no single protein number that is right for everyone. Age, activity level, body composition, total calorie intake, nutritional status, training goals and medical conditions all matter.

Key Takeaways

  • Protein needs are individual. Age, activity level, body composition, training goals, calorie intake and medical conditions all influence how much protein someone needs.
  • Protein and resistance training work together. Protein supplies the amino acids needed for repair and growth, while resistance exercise gives the body a reason to maintain and build muscle.
  • Protein becomes increasingly important with age. Preserving muscle, strength and physical function is a key part of healthy aging.
  • Total daily protein matters more than chasing a perfect post-workout window. Including meaningful protein sources throughout the day is generally more important than worrying about a strict 30-minute deadline after exercise.
  • More protein is not always better. Higher intake can be appropriate for certain athletes or during calorie restriction, but excessive protein does not automatically produce greater muscle gains.
  • Think beyond the protein number. Strength, function, body composition, lean mass, energy and recovery provide a more complete picture of whether a nutrition and exercise strategy is working.

How Much Protein Do We Need?

The adult Recommended Dietary Allowance for protein has traditionally been 0.8 grams per kilogram of body weight per day. That amount is designed to meet the basic nutritional needs of nearly all healthy adults. It was not developed as a target for maximizing muscle growth or training adaptations.

Newer dietary guidance has increasingly placed greater emphasis on higher protein intake, particularly for active individuals and healthy aging. For many adults, a range around 1.2–1.6 grams per kilogram per day can provide a practical starting framework, with the appropriate amount depending on the individual.

For healthy adults who exercise regularly, sports-nutrition recommendations commonly extend higher, particularly when resistance training or significant calorie restriction is involved.

A major meta-analysis of resistance-training trials found that additional protein produced modest further gains in muscle and strength, with the average relationship between protein intake and gains in fat-free mass leveling off around 1.6 g/kg/day. That does not mean 1.6 is a biological ceiling. It means that beyond a certain point, simply adding more protein does not necessarily produce proportionally greater results.

That distinction is important. More protein is not automatically better protein strategy. For someone who weighs 150 pounds, for example, 1.2–1.6 g/kg works out to approximately 82–109 grams of protein per day. At 180 pounds, it is approximately 98–131 grams.

Remember, those are grams of protein, not grams of food. And even those calculations require context. In someone with obesity, substantial underweight or fluid retention, we may use a reference or adjusted weight rather than automatically basing the calculation on current scale weight. Exercise volume and physical demands can also change protein requirements.

Protein Becomes Especially Important With Age

Protein deserves particular attention as we get older because aging muscle does not always respond as strongly to a small protein serving as younger muscle. This phenomenon is often referred to as anabolic resistance. That is one reason maintaining adequate protein intake becomes increasingly important with age.

But I don’t want people to hear that and conclude that they simply need to consume enormous quantities of protein. A higher protein number alone does not guarantee better function. Adequate calories matter. Progressive resistance exercise matters. Recovery matters. And conditions such as frailty, poor appetite and kidney disease may require an individualized nutritional strategy.

The goal isn’t to win a protein contest. The goal is to preserve the muscle, strength and physical capacity you will need later in life.

Daily Intake Matters More Than a Perfect “Protein Window”

One of the most persistent ideas in fitness is that protein must be consumed within a tiny window immediately after exercise or the opportunity for muscle growth is lost. The reality is more flexible.

For many people, a practical strategy is to include a meaningful source of protein at each main meal rather than consuming very little throughout the day and trying to make up for it at dinner. Breakfast is often where I see the biggest opportunity. And remember, breakfast simply means the meal that breaks your overnight fast. It doesn’t have to occur at a particular clock time.

Protein consumed around exercise can certainly support recovery, but you don’t need to panic if you don’t get a shake down within 30 minutes of your last repetition. Total daily protein intake remains enormously important.

Research has also challenged the idea that the body simply stops using protein after 30 or 40 grams. A controlled study in healthy young men found that a much larger post-exercise protein dose sustained a greater anabolic response over an extended period than a smaller dose. That does not mean everyone should begin eating 100 grams of protein at every meal. It tells us something more useful: human protein metabolism is more nuanced than a simple per-meal cutoff.

What About One Gram Per Pound?

This is where protein advice can become confusing. For someone who strength trains, around one gram of protein per pound of lean body mass can be a reasonable starting point depending on body composition, training demands and goals.

Lean body mass means your total body weight minus body fat. It does not mean muscle alone. For routine muscle building, much of the research bases recommendations on total body weight, often in the general neighborhood of 1.6–2.2 g/kg/day, or roughly 0.7–1.0 gram per pound of total body weight.

For lean, resistance-trained athletes who are dieting, higher protein intake may be useful for preserving muscle during calorie restriction. But there is a major difference between saying that higher protein may be appropriate in a specific circumstance and saying that everyone needs two grams of protein per pound of lean mass.

I would not routinely recommend the latter without a specific reason. My approach is much more practical: Eat for your body, your lean mass, your activity and your goal. Then adjust based on how you respond.

Protein and Women

Women also deserve an individualized conversation around protein rather than simply adopting a target designed around someone else’s physiology or training goals. Body size, lean mass, age, hormonal status, appetite, activity level and the type and intensity of exercise all influence what is appropriate.

For a smaller woman who is beginning resistance training, suddenly forcing very large amounts of protein into every meal may be unnecessary and uncomfortable. Someone with substantially more lean mass or a demanding training schedule may require more.

Start with an appropriate target. Strength train. Monitor how you feel and perform. Then adjust gradually when necessary. Protein should support the body you’re building, not become another nutritional extreme.

Choosing Protein Foods and Supplements

Protein does not have to come from a supplement. Fish, lean meat, eggs, poultry, dairy when tolerated, tofu, tempeh, beans and lentils can all contribute to daily intake. A varied diet also provides micronutrients, fiber and other compounds that matter for health.

Protein powders can be convenient when food alone does not easily meet someone’s needs. Complete proteins provide all nine essential amino acids. Whey is commonly used because of its amino-acid profile and convenience, although it may not be appropriate for someone who cannot tolerate dairy. Egg, beef and appropriately formulated plant proteins can provide alternatives.

Plant protein can absolutely contribute to maintaining and building muscle. The total amount of protein, essential amino-acid content, digestibility, individual tolerance and the quality of the overall diet all matter.

The question shouldn’t simply be, “Which protein powder is best?” The better question is, “What does my entire nutritional pattern look like, and is this product helping me fill a legitimate need?”

BCAAs Do Not Replace Complete Protein

Branched-chain amino acids, leucine, isoleucine and valine, are only three of the nine essential amino acids. While leucine in particular plays an important role in signaling muscle protein synthesis, muscle still requires the other essential amino acids to build new protein.

That means a BCAA supplement should not be treated as nutritionally equivalent to a complete protein source. For someone avoiding dairy, a complete plant protein or, when clinically appropriate, an essential-amino-acid product may offer a more comprehensive option than BCAAs alone.

When Protein Targets Need Medical Adjustment

General protein recommendations are not appropriate for everyone. Kidney disease is an important example. Protein targets may need to be modified according to the stage of kidney disease, nutritional status, dialysis status and other medical considerations.

Frailty, malnutrition and metabolic instability can also change the equation. This is where internet protein advice should end and individualized clinical nutrition should begin.

Protein Is Part of the Strategy, Not the Entire Strategy

For most people, the first step doesn’t need to be complicated. Look at what you currently eat over several typical days. Estimate your protein intake. Determine an appropriate goal based on your body, age, activity and health. Then begin including meaningful protein sources throughout the day.

Pair that with regular resistance training and enough overall nutrition to recover. And don’t evaluate progress solely by the scale. Look at strength. Look at function. Look at body composition. Look at lean mass. Pay attention to energy, recovery and what your body is increasingly capable of doing.

Protein matters tremendously. But more is not always better, and protein by itself does not create strength. The real objective is to give your body enough of the right nutrition, combined with the right stimulus, to preserve the muscle and physical capacity you will need for the decades ahead.

Because when we talk about healthy aging, the question isn’t simply how much protein can you consume? The better question is: What are you doing today to make sure your body remains strong enough to carry you through tomorrow?

About Dr. Michele Sherwood

Dr. Michele Sherwood, DO, is a physician, educator, author, and speaker, and co-founder of the Functional Medical Institute in Tulsa, Oklahoma. Together with her husband, Dr. Mark Sherwood, ND, a traditional naturopathic doctor and clinician, she focuses on personalized, whole-person health with an emphasis on prevention, metabolic health, healthy aging, performance, and longevity. The Sherwoods are also behind the Countdown Method, their health and performance brand offering products designed to support energy, nutrition, movement, recovery, and overall wellness. Through their clinical work, wellness brands, books, podcasts, speaking engagements and educational outreach, the Sherwoods have dedicated their careers to helping people better understand their health and become proactive participants in their long-term wellbeing.

Their new book, Authentic Longevity: Unlocking Lifelong Vitality, The Sherwood Way, combines decades of clinical experience, real patient stories, and actionable science to explore nutrition, movement, sleep, stress, hydration, genetics, peptides, supplements, hormones, and laboratory testing alongside the often-overlooked role of emotional and spiritual health. Authentic Longevity: Unlocking Lifelong Vitality, The Sherwood Way is available HERE. Listen to their weekly podcast HERE.

Women General Counsels Earn More as Representation Declines

Women serving as general counsels at major U.S. companies earned higher median compensation than their male counterparts in 2025, according to new industry data. At the same time, women’s representation among general counsels remained below earlier levels, highlighting a distinction between compensation for women already in these positions and their overall share of top corporate legal roles.

Key Takeaways

  • Women general counsels received higher median compensation than male general counsels in 2025
  • Female general counsels recorded higher median base salaries and stock awards
  • Women accounted for 33.5% of Equilar 500 general counsel positions in 2024
  • Women’s share of those positions was lower than the 34.9% recorded in 2020
  • Company size, industry, experience and incentive structures can influence executive compensation

Women General Counsels Recorded Higher Median Compensation

Women general counsels received higher median compensation than their male counterparts in the reported 2025 data.

Female general counsels had a median base salary of $672,000, compared with $657,000 for male general counsels.

The difference was larger for stock awards. Women received median stock awards of approximately $2.3 million, while men received about $1.9 million.

Those figures show women ahead on both fixed salary and equity compensation among the general counsels included in the data.

Executive pay can vary according to company size, industry, professional experience and incentive structures. Equity awards can also represent a substantial portion of an executive compensation package.

The results therefore provide a comparison of median compensation within the group studied rather than a measure of earnings for every general counsel.

Base Salaries and Equity Awards Drove Pay Differences

The 2025 figures show differences in both base salary and stock-based compensation.

At the median, female general counsels earned $15,000 more in base salary than their male counterparts. The gap in stock awards was substantially larger at approximately $400,000.

Stock compensation can vary considerably across executive positions because companies use different incentive arrangements, vesting structures and equity programs.

Broader workplace assessments also consider pay equity and advancement alongside factors such as benefits, workplace conditions and women’s representation in leadership.

These factors illustrate why total executive compensation cannot always be evaluated through salary alone. Equity and other incentive components can materially change the overall value of a compensation package.

Median figures also represent the midpoint of each group and should not be interpreted as the amount earned by every executive in the sample.

Female Representation Among General Counsels Declined

The compensation findings contrast with representation data showing that women continued to hold a minority of general counsel positions among Equilar 500 companies.

Women accounted for 33.5% of those positions in 2024, down from 34.9% in 2020.

That represents a decline of 1.4 percentage points over the period. Men therefore continued to hold roughly two-thirds of the general counsel positions included in the data.

The figures measure access to senior corporate legal roles rather than compensation after reaching those positions.

Other corporate appointments continue to provide examples of women in executive leadership, including roles that combine operational responsibility with participation in senior executive decision-making.

For general counsels, the representation figures show that higher median compensation among women already holding the role has not translated into women occupying a majority of those positions.

Executive Compensation Varies Across Corporate Roles

General counsel compensation depends on factors extending beyond gender. Company scale, sector, experience, responsibilities and incentive structures can all affect executive pay.

The 2025 figures illustrate the importance of compensation structure. The difference in median base salary between women and men was relatively modest compared with the difference in stock awards.

Female general counsels recorded a median base salary of $672,000 versus $657,000 for men. Median stock awards were approximately $2.3 million for women and $1.9 million for men.

Equity compensation can therefore have a significant effect on comparisons of executive pay.

The figures also apply specifically to general counsels in the reported data. Compensation patterns in other executive positions may differ according to role, industry and company structure.

For women in corporate legal leadership, the results provide information about compensation after reaching one of the highest legal positions within a company.

General Counsel Representation Remains Below Half of Positions

Women held 33.5% of Equilar 500 general counsel positions in 2024, keeping their representation well below half of the roles measured.

The percentage also remained below the 34.9% recorded in 2020, indicating that women’s share declined slightly over the four-year period.

That trend should be considered separately from the 2025 compensation results. Representation measures who holds general counsel positions, while compensation measures how executives in those positions are paid.

The two sets of figures therefore present different aspects of corporate legal leadership. Women in the reported compensation data earned higher median salaries and stock awards, while women still accounted for roughly one-third of the general counsel roles measured in the representation data.

Together, the findings show that compensation outcomes and leadership representation can move in different directions.

Frequently Asked Questions

How much did women general counsels earn in 2025?

Female general counsels had a median base salary of $672,000 in the reported 2025 data. Their median stock awards were approximately $2.3 million.

Did women general counsels earn more than men?

The reported 2025 figures show women general counsels ahead of men in median base salary and stock awards. Women had a median salary of $672,000 compared with $657,000 for men.

What percentage of general counsels are women?

Women accounted for 33.5% of Equilar 500 general counsel positions in 2024.

Did the share of women general counsels increase or decrease?

Women’s representation declined from 34.9% in 2020 to 33.5% in 2024, a decrease of 1.4 percentage points.

Which factors affect general counsel compensation?

Company size, industry, professional experience, responsibilities and incentive structures can influence executive compensation. Stock awards can also represent a substantial portion of total pay.

Love is Messy, but I love Writing About it – Lauryn Jay

By Lauryn Jay

I was sitting at a bar earlier this year, drinking a wonderful glass of Pinot Noir and eating a perfectly cooked salmon with risotto on the side. I was alone, as it was a work trip and the colleagues I was traveling with hadn’t arrived yet, so like any introverted, anti-social gal, I glued my eyes to the screen of my phone.

But I wasn’t drowning out the noise and ignoring the outside world. In fact, I was very much listening in on the conversation next to me. An older couple in matching uniforms of t-shirts and jeans were chatting about their son and how he needed to propose to his girlfriend already. This amused me, and I had to know more. My eyes lifted from my phone and darted to the gentleman who gave me a small smile. “Sorry, I didn’t mean to be eavesdropping,” I lied, “but my brother has been dating this woman for over eight years and he still hasn’t proposed.” That line opened up an almost hour’s worth of conversation with the couple whom I discovered had been coming to this same bar for their weekly date night for over twenty years. The gentleman was more verbose with their history and stories, and the woman continued to nod and smile while throwing in anecdotes and pieces of history he’d forgotten. All the while, she had her knee positioned tightly next to his, as if they were stuck together with glue. I knew I had to write about this moment.

When I got back to my hotel room, I opened my laptop and feverishly typed down all the thoughts and emotions I had from the evening, and after a few hours, came up with some pretty clever story concepts. Because that’s what I love to do, I love investigating people and relationships to understand their view on love, what happens when it all works out, or when it crashes and burns. The highs, the lows, the perfect meet-cutes, and the missed opportunities. I observe it all, so I can write about it all.

The best stories are the ones that hit you at your core. Where you stop reading and say, “Oh my god, that’s totally me.” Love stories aren’t just cute, sappy, happily ever-afters; love stories are full-on investigations of the wonder, the lust, the vibrancy, the misery, and the heartbreak. To me, they are the toughest stories to write about because, as a writer, I have to strip away all my pre-conceived notions and feelings about people and allow myself to be open and vulnerable. And while that’s sometimes scary to do, it’s crucial to write an effective love story – and I love when the emotions pour out of me and onto the page.

I hope my stories connect with readers on an emotional level. I hope they smile, laugh, and even cry because the words resonate with their own lives. Stories connect us, and it’s my job as a writer to keep that connection alive.

So, if you happen to see a random woman at a bar swirling her glass of wine and looking down at her phone, she may very well be writing the next great love story.