Women's Journal

Recognizing Red Flags in Emotional Abuse: What I Wish I Knew About Manipulation and Control in Wendeline McDonald’s ‘The Unloved Child’

By: Jackie B. Eller

Manipulation and control are not always immediately obvious. They may begin with seemingly small things, hidden behind words that may appear loving or caring. Many people may not realize they are in an abusive relationship until they find themselves feeling deeply trapped. Looking back, I wish I had been able to recognize the red flags sooner.

Abuse is not only physical. Emotional abuse can also be incredibly damaging. It may begin with what feels like concern, but over time, it can evolve into controlling behaviors. A partner might say, “I just worry about you,” when trying to influence what you wear or who you talk to. Initially, this might seem like love, but over time, this concern can transform into rules and restrictions that can feel stifling.

In The Unloved Child by Wendeline McDonald, the protagonist experiences this type of control from the people who are meant to protect her. They dictate her actions, her words, and even her thoughts. She learns to comply, as resisting might lead to punishment.

Another potential red flag is isolation. Manipulative individuals may want to limit their victims’ access to support. Over time, they might attempt to separate them from friends and family. They might say, “Your friends don’t care about you like I do,” or “Your family is against us.” These words can plant seeds of doubt and fear. In The Unloved Child, Wendeline finds herself distanced from love and kindness. Her world becomes more isolated as her abuser works to remove her connections to others.

Gaslighting is also a common sign of manipulation. An abuser might make the victim question their own reality. They could say, “That never happened,” or “You are imagining things.” Over time, the victim might start doubting their own memories and instincts, leading to feelings of confusion and loss. Wendeline McDonald depicts this feeling in The Unloved Child, where Wendeline grows up believing she is the problem because her abuser convinces her that her pain is not real.

Controlling individuals may also use guilt and fear as tools to gain power. They can make the victim feel responsible for their emotions. For example, they might say, “If you loved me, you would do this for me,” or “Look at what you made me do.” This can make the victim feel guilty for standing up for themselves. In The Unloved Child, Wendeline often faces this type of manipulation. She is made to believe that her suffering is her fault, which can keep her trapped in a cycle of self-blame.

Financial control is another way abusers might exert power over their victims. They may take away access to money or create a dependency, making it more difficult for the victim to leave. Without financial resources, many victims feel as though they have no other option but to stay. While this type of control is often less discussed, it can be a powerful tool of manipulation.

Jealousy and possessiveness are often confused with love. A controlling partner might say, “I can’t bear the thought of losing you,” while demanding to know where you are at all times. They may accuse you of cheating or lying, even when you haven’t done anything wrong. This can create unnecessary drama to keep the victim emotionally exhausted. In The Unloved Child, the abuser uses this tactic to maintain power over Wendeline, making her feel guilty for things she didn’t do.

Breaking free from manipulation and control is not simple, and it can take time. The first step is recognizing the signs early. Abuse is not always obvious, and it may begin with small, seemingly harmless demands that, over time, can escalate into more controlling behaviors. By the time the victim realizes what is happening, they may feel too weak to fight back.

If any of these red flags resonate with you, it’s important to understand that you are not alone. Many people have experienced similar situations. It is possible to escape and begin the healing process. The Unloved Child by Wendeline McDonald serves as a powerful reminder of the lasting effects of abuse, while also showing the potential for survival and recovery. The past doesn’t have to define a person. Healing is a journey that can take time, but it is possible. If you are looking for a story that speaks to the silent struggles many people face, this book is one that should not be overlooked.

 

Disclaimer: The content of this article is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered as professional advice. The discussion of manipulation, control, and emotional abuse is based on personal experiences and literature, and may not reflect the experiences of all individuals. If you or someone you know is experiencing abuse, it is important to seek help from a licensed professional or support services. The views expressed in this article are those of the author and do not represent any specific therapeutic or legal guidance.

2025 NCAA Women’s Soccer Tournament: Teams to Watch This Year

Soccer tournament kickoff: the bracket reveal

The 2025 NCAA Women’s Soccer Tournament bracket dropped on November 10, 2025, and it immediately set the women’s soccer world buzzing. Sixty‑four teams earned their place, half through automatic conference bids and half through at‑large selections, creating a field that blends powerhouse programs with hungry challengers.

The Atlantic Coast Conference (ACC) once again stole the spotlight. Stanford’s thrilling 5‑4 win over Notre Dame in the ACC championship secured them a No. 1 seed, while Virginia claimed the final top seed thanks to a season of defensive grit and midfield creativity. The ACC’s dominance raises a familiar question: can anyone outside the conference break through to the College Cup?

But this year’s bracket also delivered surprises. Vanderbilt stunned LSU in penalty kicks to win its first SEC championship since 2020, earning the fourth No. 1 seed and injecting fresh energy into the tournament. Their victory signals that the balance of power may be shifting, and fans across the country are watching closely to see if the SEC can finally challenge the ACC’s dynasty.

The bracket reveal also highlighted rising programs. TCU, Michigan State, Kansas, and Colorado all landed in the top‑10 RPI rankings, proving that momentum is building outside traditional strongholds. These teams represent regions eager to disrupt the narrative, and their placement in the bracket sets up potential early‑round clashes that could redefine the tournament.

With the bracket set, the stage is clear: powerhouse programs will defend their legacies, while rising challengers look to carve new paths. That tension is what makes this soccer tournament more than just a competition, it’s a cultural moment.

Why this soccer tournament matters for women’s sports

This soccer tournament is more than a bracket, it’s a showcase of athletic excellence, resilience, and community pride. For athletes, it’s the culmination of years of training. For fans, it’s a chance to rally behind programs that embody empowerment and achievement.

Women’s soccer has grown exponentially in visibility and investment over the past decade. From the U.S. Women’s National Team’s global success to the rise of professional leagues, the NCAA tournament now serves as a pipeline for future stars. Every match is not just about advancing, it’s about proving that women’s sports deserve the spotlight.

And that spotlight matters. Sponsorships, media coverage, and fan engagement hinge on tournaments like this. The NCAA Women’s Soccer Tournament is not just about crowning a champion, it’s about affirming that women’s sports are central to the cultural conversation.

Powerhouse programs to watch

The bracket reveal set the tone, but the real intrigue lies in the teams themselves. Several programs enter the tournament with reputations that precede them, and their performances will shape the narrative of 2025.

Stanford Cardinal: Fresh off their ACC championship win, Stanford enters the tournament as a top seed. Their offensive firepower, led by dynamic forwards, and ability to thrive under pressure make them a favorite.

Notre Dame Fighting Irish: Despite the narrow loss to Stanford, Notre Dame remains a formidable contender. Their balanced roster and tactical discipline could carry them deep into the bracket.

Virginia Cavaliers: Securing the final No. 1 seed, Virginia represents the ACC’s depth. Their defensive resilience and midfield creativity will be tested against rising challengers.

North Carolina Tar Heels: The defending national champions, UNC remain a perennial powerhouse. Though they didn’t capture the ACC crown this year, their history of 22 College Cup appearances means they can never be counted out.

Florida State Seminoles: With 10 ACC tournament titles since 2013, FSU’s pedigree is undeniable. Their ability to peak in postseason play makes them dangerous, even as a lower seed.

Together, these programs embody the tradition and dominance of women’s college soccer. Yet the curiosity gap remains: will one of them continue the dynasty, or will a challenger finally break through?

Rising challengers outside the ACC

While the ACC commands attention, 2025 could be the year of the outsider. Programs like Vanderbilt, TCU, Michigan State, Kansas, and Colorado enter the tournament with momentum and top‑10 RPIs.

  • Vanderbilt Commodores: Their penalty‑kick victory over LSU secured the SEC crown and a No. 1 seed. With a mix of veteran leadership and youthful energy, Vanderbilt is poised to challenge the ACC’s dominance.
  • TCU Horned Frogs: Known for their aggressive style and high‑tempo attack, TCU could surprise higher‑seeded opponents. Their ability to press relentlessly makes them dangerous in knockout play.
  • Michigan State Spartans: With a disciplined defense and a goalkeeper ranked among the nation’s best, Michigan State is built for tournament survival.
  • Kansas Jayhawks: Riding momentum from a strong regular season, Kansas embodies the underdog spirit. Their midfield creativity and home‑grown talent could spark an upset run.
  • Colorado Buffaloes: Their altitude‑tested endurance and physical style give them an edge in grueling matches. Colorado’s ability to wear down opponents could prove decisive.

These rising challengers represent regions eager to disrupt the traditional power balance. Their presence ensures that the tournament will not be a predictable march of favorites, but a dynamic clash of styles and ambitions.

Soccer tournament schedule and cultural framing

The tournament begins with first‑round matches on November 14–16, followed by the second round on November 20, third round on November 23, and quarterfinals on November 28–30. The semifinals and final, the College Cup, will be held at CPKC Stadium in Kansas City in December.

2025 NCAA Women’s Soccer Tournament Teams to Watch This Year

Photo Credit: Unsplash.com

Beyond the schedule, the cultural framing matters. This soccer tournament is not just about crowning a champion, it’s about showcasing women’s sports on a national stage. Every match is an opportunity to highlight athleticism, teamwork, and empowerment. For communities across the U.S., the tournament is a rallying point, connecting fans to athletes who embody resilience and pride.

What this soccer tournament means for women’s sports in 2025

The 2025 NCAA Women’s Soccer Tournament is more than a bracket, it’s a statement. It reflects the growth of women’s sports, the passion of athletes, and the support of communities.

For women athletes, the tournament is a platform to showcase talent and inspire future generations. For fans, it’s a chance to witness history. For sponsors and media, it’s proof that women’s sports drive engagement and excitement.

The bigger picture is clear: this soccer tournament is not just about goals and victories, it’s about empowerment, visibility, and the future of women’s sports.

International Olympic Committee Reviews Gender Rules for Women’s Sports

Gender rules under review: a turning point for women’s sports

The International Olympic Committee (IOC) is reviewing gender rules for women’s sports, a move that could reshape competition at the highest levels. With Kirsty Coventry elected as the IOC’s first female president in March 2025, the organization has shifted from leaving eligibility decisions to individual federations toward considering universal rules for women’s categories.

Coventry’s leadership has already sparked debate. Early scientific reviews presented to IOC members suggest that physical advantages may remain for athletes born male even after testosterone suppression. But no final decision has been made, and IOC officials stress that discussions are ongoing.

This moment is historic. For decades, women athletes have fought for recognition and fairness, often while navigating policies that were inconsistent or unclear. The IOC’s review is not just about eligibility, it is about redefining what fairness means in the modern era of sport.

Why gender rules matter for women’s sports

Gender rules are not just technical regulations, they are cultural signals that shape the very identity of women’s sports. For athletes, the debate is about fairness, recognition, and opportunity. Supporters of stricter rules argue that protecting the female category ensures a level playing field, while advocates for inclusion emphasize that sport should reflect diversity and respect identity.

The stakes are enormous. Women’s sports have historically been underfunded, under‑promoted, and undervalued compared to men’s competitions. Every rule that defines who can compete in women’s categories directly impacts sponsorships, visibility, and legitimacy. If the rules are unclear, women athletes risk being overshadowed or questioned, even when they achieve extraordinary success.

History shows how deeply gender rules have shaped women’s sports. In the 1960s and 1970s, the IOC required invasive sex‑verification tests, often humiliating female athletes and undermining their dignity. By the 2000s, policies shifted to testosterone thresholds, but these rules were criticized for being arbitrary and inconsistent. Today, the debate has evolved into one of science, ethics, and identity, but the underlying issue remains: how to protect fairness while respecting inclusion.

International Olympic Committee Reviews Gender Rules for Women’s Sports

Photo Credit: Unsplash.com

Globally, federations have taken different approaches. World Athletics and World Aquatics ban transgender women from elite female competition, citing physical advantages. The NCAA in the United States allows participation under certain hormone‑suppression conditions. FIFA has yet to finalize a universal policy, leaving football federations to decide individually. This patchwork of rules creates confusion for athletes, fans, and sponsors, and underscores why the IOC’s review matters so much, it could set a global standard.

For women athletes, the implications are personal. Eligibility rules determine who they compete against, how their achievements are judged, and whether their victories are seen as legitimate. For communities, the debate reflects values: fairness, inclusion, and empowerment. For sponsors and media, clarity in gender rules affects investment and coverage.

The curiosity gap is clear: will new gender rules empower women’s sports by ensuring fairness, or will they risk deepening divides by excluding athletes? The IOC’s decisions will not only shape competition but also influence how society views women’s sports in the 21st century.

Gender rules and the Olympic stage

The stakes are high because the Olympics are more than competitions, they are cultural touchstones. A universal IOC policy on gender rules would ripple across federations, national committees, and grassroots programs. Reports suggest a ban could be introduced in time for the 2028 Los Angeles Olympics, though officials emphasize that no decisions have been finalized.

For women athletes, the curiosity gap is whether new gender rules will empower women’s sports or deepen divides. Will the IOC’s decisions create clarity, or will they spark new controversies? These questions ensure that the debate will remain front‑page news well beyond the Olympic movement.

The Olympic stage magnifies every decision. Rules set here influence not only elite athletes but also youth programs, sponsorships, and media coverage. For women’s sports, the IOC’s review is therefore not just about competition, it is about visibility, investment, and legitimacy.

Gender rules as cultural framing

The IOC’s review of gender rules is also a cultural moment. Women’s sports have long fought for recognition, investment, and respect. The debate over gender rules intersects with broader conversations about equality, identity, and representation.

For women athletes, eligibility rules determine who they compete against, how they are judged, and whether their achievements are seen as legitimate. For communities, the debate reflects values: fairness, inclusion, and empowerment. The IOC’s decisions will therefore resonate far beyond stadiums, shaping how society views women’s sports in the 21st century.

This cultural framing matters because sport is never just about competition. It is about identity, belonging, and pride. The IOC’s review of gender rules is therefore not only a technical exercise, it is a cultural signal about how women’s sports are valued.

Gender rules and women’s voices

Women athletes and advocates are demanding that their voices be central to the IOC’s review. Many argue that past debates have sidelined women, treating them as subjects rather than participants. Coventry’s leadership as the IOC’s first female president is seen as a chance to change that dynamic.

The IOC has promised that its working group will consult widely, though the names of experts remain confidential to protect integrity. For women’s sports, the curiosity gap is whether this consultation will translate into meaningful influence. Will women athletes shape the rules that define their categories, or will decisions be made without their input?

Athletes like Martina Navratilova and Paula Radcliffe have spoken publicly about the importance of protecting women’s categories, while others emphasize the need for inclusion and respect for transgender athletes. These voices highlight the diversity of perspectives within women’s sports, underscoring the complexity of the debate.

What gender rules mean for women’s sports in 2025

The IOC’s review of gender rules is not just about eligibility, it is about identity, fairness, and the future of women’s sports. No final decision has been made, but the direction is clear: the IOC is moving toward universal rules for female categories, with a focus on protecting fairness.

For women athletes, the implications are profound. Gender rules will determine not only who competes but also how women’s sports are valued. The bigger picture is clear: gender rules are not just technical, they are cultural affirmations of what women’s sports represent.

The curiosity gap remains: will new gender rules empower women’s sports, or will they create new divides? For now, women athletes and communities are watching closely, knowing that the IOC’s decisions will shape the future of sport for generations.